🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is pursuing damages amounting to $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This action constitutes a clear response by the Kremlin against proposals to utilize immobilized Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority filed a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will determine later this week regarding a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and economic needs.

The vast majority of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary custodian for the Russian frozen sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union authorities have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the fact that ownership of the state assets still belongs to Russia, despite being it was frozen in European countries following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any utilization of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has warned of reciprocal actions, such as seizing EU private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a key position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

In comments interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house refused to comment on the latest legal action. It has previously stated it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While courts in EU countries are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if relevant holdings can be identified," stated a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are working on measures to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting protections to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the complex scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would only be obligated to return the loan if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the immense damage inflicted during the ongoing conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different method for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, however, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she remarked. "It also sends a powerful signal that if you do all this damage to another country, you must pay for the reparations."